No difference between a cogent argument and a rant? Yes, I had some time to kill to make this argument. Normally articles wherein the author shows disdain for his readers by littering the prose with grammatical errors, would not warrant my time.
Sometimes though, it is interesting to see how an author handles criticism. Especially when they preach us to have more conversations.

In this case, you have shown, with both your replies, that you don’t practice what you preach, and this, one may argue, is dishonest.

Btw. You publish on a public forum but then you argue that readers should criticize your article in private? In what universe?

Again, with both your replies, you demonstrate that you are incapable, or unwilling, to practice what you preach, i.e. more conversations with more and better listening to improve the world.

No evidence of that in your replies. That’s great, because it means that you have a lot to learn and a lot to improve upon. And what gives more satisfaction than learning and improving?

Greetings and wishing you well,
Mitch