"he is a good man with a good message", that is aggrandising. He has a point with regard to the speech that certain people appear to demand. But guess what? We do not have to comply. And he, as a civil person, will use the requested pronoun if someone asks him. When laws are being made, then Peterson objects. And we should. Not because it is wrong, but because it is completely impractical. Peteron also lives in many bubbles, such as: Christianity is good, Socialism is bad, if you adress systemic racism you are radical Left, if the 'radical left (wtf is that anyway?) continuous like this )like how?) then the extreme right will use violence (so that will be the fault of the left too), etc. So like many men, Peterson makes some valid arguments, but boy does he live in some bubbles whilst telling us to get out of ours. The jump to 'good man' with 'good message' is just a personal claim that says something about the writer but nothing about Peterson.